I feel very let-down! I was expecting to read a book about the conjunction and possible cross-fertilization between Physics and Economics. Instead, I get a long lecture of the history of physics, and why it is better than all other sciences as well as an explanation of why economics is not a science. And to top it of, when the author tries to tell me why (on both accounts), he manages to mis-represent both economics and the applicability of physics on it. Maybe the physics part are good (I am not enough of an expert to determine that), but the economics parts are so stupidly expressed, that the author would fail 101 Economics!

Waste of space and time.